Referral Partners
For the professional commissioning the assessment
Two referral channels. One instrument. The clinical professional needs to know where the actual problem lives before treatment begins. The professional services partner needs to know whether the individual at the center of the exposure can carry what is being asked of them. Both need independent structural measurement that does not rely on the subject's self-report.
CLINICAL CHANNEL
For Clinical Psychologists, Licensed Therapists, Licensed Counselors, and LCSWs.
Your client has described where they believe the problem lives. They have told you what they think is wrong. Your clinical training has produced a working hypothesis. The question is whether the domain your client identified — and the domain your hypothesis targets — is where the structural problem is actually housed.
In 81.4% of cases, it is not.
The Structural Stability Assessment identifies where the actual problem lives — independent of what the client reports. The assessment produces a written engineering report documenting the client's self-placed coordinates, the structurally confirmed coordinates, and the precise domain where the gap between the two is housed. The report is shared with you to inform treatment planning.
This is not a competing clinical instrument. It is the structural diagnostic that precedes clinical intervention. The SSA finds the domain. You treat it. Without the SSA, intervention proceeds from the reported position. With it, intervention proceeds from the confirmed one.
$1,500 per assessment. Assessment, written report, and ninety-minute consultation with the client. Findings coordinated with referring clinician.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CHANNEL
For Attorneys, PE Principals, Fund Managers, and Forensic Accountants.
You are not the subject. You are the professional holding the exposure. The individual at the center of your case, your portfolio, your estate, or your deal is the subject. You need an independent read on whether that individual's structural state matches what they are reporting — because the decisions you are making depend on it.
You already know the blind spot exists. You have watched a client make decisions that did not match the client's stated reasoning. You have watched a founder degrade under post-acquisition load while insisting he was fine. You have documented financial behavior that did not match the principal's self-described decision-making process. You have observed the gap. You have not been able to measure it.
Tier 1 — Individual Assessment. $5,000–$8,000.
The subject is you. No third-party referral partner in the structure. The exposure being assessed is your own — your decisions, your structural state, your trajectory under the load you are currently carrying.
Two patterns enter at this tier. The first is the fiduciary professional — attorney, PE principal, angel group lead, forensic accountant — evaluating whether to refer clients into Tier 2 or Tier 3. The demonstration assessment on yourself is the cleanest evaluation pathway. You experience the instrument. The report lands on you. You evaluate it against what you know to be true.
The second is the high-capacity individual operating under load where the self-assessment loop is no longer reliable. A founder mid-scale. An executive in late-career transition. An attorney carrying a high fiduciary book. A principal managing material exposure where the consequences of structural misread are large. The assessment reads what you cannot read about yourself.
Tier 2 — Professional Risk Assessment. $15,000–$25,000.
The subject is your client. The assessment is commissioned by you. The question is operational: is the subject's structural state matching what the subject is reporting about it. The referral partner has a decision in front of them — the trust, the deal, the case, the investment — and the structural read informs whether the subject is embodying the capacity their decisions presuppose, or performing it.
Governed briefing delivery. Written engineering report. Fee proportional to exposure.
Tier 3 — Critical Exposure Assessment. $25,000–$50,000.
The subject is a third party. The referral partner is carrying material fiduciary or financial exposure tied to the subject's structural integrity. The depth of the assessment, the breadth of the contextual risk mapping, and the page count of the deliverable scale with the exposure.
Typical engagements: PE acquisitions above $50M where the founder is the asset. Hedge fund key-person evaluations on material allocations. Family office governance where the principal's structural integrity affects multi-generational exposure. Estate planning at scale where decision-making capacity is the contested variable. Pre-IPO leadership evaluation. Litigation where capacity is in dispute and the financial exposure is material.
Full stabilization protocol available. Forward trajectory prediction with six-month verification documented against actual outcomes.
For Attorneys, PE Principals, Fund Managers, and Forensic Accountants.
The entry question is yours.
The assessment is anchored to the specific question you are holding — whether you are a therapist asking where the real problem lives or an attorney asking whether your client's judgment is structurally sound. Your question defines the engagement scope. The instrument answers it.
The demonstration is available.
Every referral partner — clinical or professional services — is offered a Tier 1 demonstration assessment on themselves. You experience the instrument directly. The report lands on you personally. You evaluate it against what you know to be true about yourself. The fastest path to evaluating the work is experiencing it.
The delivery is governed.
Findings are not delivered in a data dump. For clinical referral partners, the report is coordinated directly — the structural coordinates shared in language that maps to your treatment framework. For professional services partners, the briefing is calibrated to one structural finding, one trajectory, one implication mapped to the decision you are currently holding, one risk statement denominated in dollars and time. The full structural read is in the written report. The briefing delivers the operational layer. The report holds the depth.
The report goes in the file.
For clinical partners, the report informs treatment planning — it identifies the confirmed domain before intervention begins. For professional services partners, the report follows the engagement tradition you already operate in. Engagement letter. Documented methodology. Professional liability. It does not enter a clinical record. It belongs in your file next to the forensic accounting finding, the operational diligence, and the financial analysis.
CLOSE
The professional who engages now is the professional who has the instrument before the professional across the hall does. The practice is in its founding period. The engagement base is in early accumulation. The evaluation pathway is direct: read the report on a real subject, compare it to what you can independently verify, and let the engagements accumulate into precedent.
The founding period is not a limitation. It is the window.